Because you'd like it

Make The Girl Dance "Baby Baby Baby" ( official video )
by placeblancherec

Trump allows Christian Skank to keep crown

So Donald Trump allowed Prejean to keep her crown in light of the topless photos. Does really surprise anyone? Donald fucking Trump knows two things in this world: 1.) money and 2.) skanks. Of course he's going to let the homophobe Christian slut to keep her crown! The moment it was announced that it was in the hands of Trump, I was already grimacing in my seat because Prejean is just the sort of girl who would be his 100th wife.

I just find it in poor taste as there are several young girls who see the Miss States as something of a role model. I'm no prude, but when girls as young as my niece are exposed to this, it gives them the sense that it's okay to be this way. I've always said one should embrace sexuality, but I never once said that children so take half nude photos of themselves at the age of seventeen, such as the ones Prejean had taken.

Prejean spoke against the naysayers that spoke out against her. What she said doesn't change the fact that she's still a skank. Nothing, not even God, could change that fact.

God hates fags, but looooooves skanks

Carrie Prejean is what I like to call a closet case skank: She has all the qualities of a skank, but she has Christian virtues. Miss California, who prefers opposite sex (meaning traditional, but let's face it, skanks don't have much of a brain, hence the reason why they're skanks and not Nobel Prize winners), has been made the fool on across the cyberworld. Six scandelous photos of the "traditional" thinking vixen has surfaced the Internet. Perhaps Miss California should rethink her values before putting her foot in her mouth and showing off her goods.

Too good to pass up

One of those I-need-a-camera moments. Yesterday, Jyg, Bel and I were heading toward McAllen to hit up Hastings. First we dropped off some video games at Hollywood in Edinburg for my sister-in-law. As we were turning back onto University Dr. we saw this Explorer-ish vehicle with the above logo. I lost it when I saw that this Gay dealership was out of a city named Dickinson, TX. It's the little things that make life grand.

Офисные олимпийские игры (No idea what that says)

Pondering

Lessons Learned

This is the first I hear of Matt and Kim Star. I'm not hip with the music these days, mainly sticking to my old collection and hoping that a revival soon approaches, otherwise I'm gonna be stuck listening to garbage on the radio. However, this song's great. I might even look them up elsewhere if I ever should feel like it. And before you start jumping off the deep end, I love the song for itself, not the music video.

The type of guy you take home to your therapist

I'm sure a few of you are guilty of the Craigslist personal ad. You know the one where you're so horny you're willing to fuck the first person who responds to your post. Well, this isn't really one those, but it is a personal ad and it did catch my eye. Just read it and you'll see why I can't stop laughing.

[Source]

Man has no control over public masturbation

Because I'm a guy, I can smell guy bullshit. I know when someone is being sincere when he tells his significant other that the big-titted chick with the miniskirt is nothing compared to her and when he's gonna be thinking about said hussy when he's fucking his girl later. So when someone throws out a medical term like alien hand syndrome as an excuse of his public masturbation, you have to ponder if it's just a load of BS.

Marilyn Chambers dies, age 56

LOS ANGELES - A friend of adult film star Marilyn Chambers says the actress has been found dead at her home in northern Los Angeles County.

Peggy McGinn says the 56-year-old Chambers was found by her 17-year-old daughter Sunday night and the cause of death has not been determined.

Chambers starred in the 1972 film "Behind the Green Door," which was more widely distributed and attracted a more mainstream audience than the usual adult fare.

Chambers, whose given name was Marilyn Briggs, was once a model for Ivory Snow. She was among the first porn superstars when the stag films of the 1940s through 1960s gave way to the more polished sex films of the 1970s.

(source)

Jump on the Sex Bandwagon!

Kim Basinger showed embarrassment at the fact that several of her daughter's friends have seen her nude in her past films; Cindy Crawford, at the age of 13, is quite possibly thinking the opposite.

The 90's bombshell taking it off for the camera comes at a time when several women across the nation are joining the sex biz. No connections, I'm sure.

And while their mothers are off shooting porn, teenage girls are "sexting" it up. One group of girls have gone as far as to sue a prosecutor who was going to charge them with child pornography.

As my little old, prudish grandmother would say, "Aye dios mio." It seems everyone and their mother is getting on the sex bandwagon.

[Photo Source]

Teen Sex

The hot button isn't just sex; it's teen sex. A lot of us would rather hide under a rock than to acknowledge that children - your children - are sexually active. Rather than teaching them how to protect themselves should they decide to engage in it, we opt to keep them in the dark with abstinence-only programs at school.

Being the sort of person who cries when a condom commercial airs on television before 9PM can be disastrous if you cringe at the thought of talking to your teen about doing the nasty. Abstinence-only ideology isn't cutting it - what can we do to stop teen pregnancies if we refuse to teach them the alternative of safe sex?

[Photo Source]

The Racy Photo

Let's face it: We're not all made to grace the covers of Playboy or Playgirl, but one man wants your naughty sexts for artistic reasons. The fact that your naughty pics are considered art is just as strange as your sister's compulsive problem to sucking on your breasts. I know a few of you just got a rise out of that last bit of information, but trust me, corrections were made.

Because we'd rather be the ones sucking on the breasts of our sister-in-laws, or pleasing our brother-in-laws – admit it, you've thought of it – we must question if humans are monogamous creatures. Some say we're not; others say you make the commitment to one person and only one. If you're looking for some new excitement, however, a nice guy has made a list for you to follow to avoid problems. But to be honest, I think one woman is enough for me. And I didn't write that because she's standing behind me, grimacing. I mean it. Seriously. She's not standing behind me.

[Picture Source]

Few Words on our Sexual Culture

Crammed in the court house auditorium with several other disgruntled, potential jurors, I begin to mull over the concept "of sound mind or good moral character." I deduce that those who are not of sound mind aren't the sort of people who make asses out of themselves online; rather they are people of my intelligence with some sort of "mental disability." Concluding that I'm not of sound mind because my anxiety may hinder my decision making, I still have trouble wrapping my head around the concept "of good moral character."

How does anyone judge whether or not he or she is of good moral character? The most obvious arises: those who deal or do drugs; those who are incline to take bribes; those who are racists; those who are sympathizers to child molesters; those who run sex shops (such as illegal prostitution and sex trafficking). These are the sort of people that came to mind when I thought about it long enough. However, good moral character has a plethora of connotations. For instance, the pornographer releasing the 100^th triple-X Blu-ray title (may be NSFW) may seen as a person of poor moral character by a few of you out there. Or the person who shoves his hands down his pants and masturbates to online fodder, may be consider an individual of poor moral character. Even the woman having sex would be considered a person of poor moral character. None of these, however, would exactly exempt them from serving on a jury.

Sex sales – we've all heard the concept before. Yet, for every Calvin Klein commercial there is a group of people crying to the FCC that sex is destroying the innocence that is found in the youth of America. However, the very same youth of America they're aiming to protect are being arrested for creating, having and networking child pornography. Tougher laws are being pushed after one girl decided to take her own life after nude photos were distributed to several classmates through the very technology that she used to take them.

Several parents place the blame in the wrong mediums: sexuality on the television; sexuality in music; online pornography; celebrity sex tapes. If you can think it, it's been blamed for being responsible for the sudden boom in child sexual activity. Child upbringing starts at home and what you allow and don't allow your child to watch. Every parent has a different way of parenting, but by making something taboo, one is only driving their children into it. Talking to your child about the consequences of their actions might be a better path to take. As one porn filmmaker said, "Once you make an adult film, it never goes away."

With current situations, however, it's not surprise that sex is getting so much attention again (as if there was ever a time when it didn't). The economy is crashing and the sex industry – namely, the adult movie industry, is seeking government help in the form of a bailout. What an absurd idea, am I right? So absurd it's like calling the deputy attorney general a pornographer due to court cases and free speech issues he'd taken on in the past. It would seem that the lyrics of the off Broadway musical turned internet meme is flawed: the porn industry isn't immune to the recession.

Where does this leave us, though? Are we in our current position because we're people who don't possess good moral character? Some say we need a spiritual bailout and turn to imaginary friends in the sky for aid. In fact, I think we're quite the opposite of needing a spiritual bailout. If anything, we're in a great need of spiritual purging.

It seems that several of us have forgotten what really makes this country great: The idea that every man is created equal. It is in our inalienable right to love another person; one could say it's our god-given right. Marriage, as it turns out, isn't.

Our freedoms have been compromised by the devout and homophobia has spilled over the Supreme Court. Relying on hate mongers to pass laws and keep the interest of this country's people is as intelligent as letting the KKK decide if the Holocaust is historically correct.

It's sad thought that the very people who'd hinder love from flourishing are thought to be those of good moral character. It would seem that these people don't follow or understand the teachings they preach. Rather than accepting individuals into their lives, they cast stones and expel them from their chapels. It seems they'd rather seen a child go homeless and die on the streets than to fathom the idea of two men or women raising it. And from hate springs more hate – no one is born homophobic (or racist for that matter), it's their upbringing. And unlike homosexuality, this sort of mindset can be changed and needs to be changed if we're ever going to thrive in this time of need.

We need to escape this "Mrs. Grundyism," as A.C. Grayling called it, and progress toward a better future. (For those of you scratching your head on the definition, in his essay "Sex," he describes it as: the moral conservatism which presumes to tell other people what to think and how to behave.) By allowing the government or our so-called moral leaders to tell us who we can and cannot marry, we're losing a little bit of ourselves in the process. We cannot call ourselves the land of the free if there is an exception tagged on by an asterisk.

We come at last to the question that started all this: What does it take for a person to be of good moral character? Acceptance is one – possibly the most ideal trait. But is acceptance alone going to do it for us? Perhaps none of us will ever be a person of good moral character.

From Garden Snake to Trouser Snake

I love cheesy porn introductions - you know what I'm talking about: the one where the pizza delivery guy/plumber/mechanic/husband (um...these usually work when the husband gets home early and finds the babysitter masturbating on the couch to his sex tape)/whatever says something cheesy and then does something cheesy that leads to hot explicit sex. Yeah, those are usually much more enjoyable that the porn flick itself. Wait. Is it weird that I think that?

Embarrassed Naked Mom

Kim Basinger, known for her roles in movies such as 9 1/2 Weeks, is embarrassed and feeling rather vulnerable. I know, what exactly does she feel vulnerable about? This stunning 55-year-old luscious woman is still working a killer bod - certainly if half the women at her age had her prowess, they wouldn't mind spending a few hours walking about completely nude. Wait, actually, that's exactly why Basinger is embarrassed about.

Perhaps it's not a regret toward ever doing a nude scene but, rather, the fact that her teenage daughter's friends have seen those movies. In fact, that is the case. Most boys paw at the chance to see their friend's attractive mother naked, but Kim makes it easy. All they have to do is go down to the video store and rent out a movie.

Wild Sex Tape!

Amid the (rumored) break up, hit maker, Rihanna is worried that a sex tape might make the internet. The tape contains (allegedly) both Rihanna and male chauvinist/woman beater Chris Brown. She worries that such a video can ruin her career. However, this would-be blogger states that, if anything, the sex tape will land her a four season reality show contract with E!

All Girls are Girly

She was our favorite little explorer, wasn't she? But she was just more than that. Dora the Explorer was a symbol that not all girls have to think about lipstick and powder, paving the way for the ideal androgyny that the prude nation needed. Sadly, our favorite little explorer has gone through some cosmetic surgery and the final draft of her has been released. Behold! the evidence being spoon-fed to young girls everywhere: It's not okay to be a tomboy!

At least she's still brown.

The holy space ghost

I noticed that I've gone astray with this blog. That's because the news is always the same damn thing. Over and over, the same complaints. I'm going into hiding and attempt this again. Maybe make it more adult and less PG-13.

Why Dr Ted Baehr needs to be sodomize by a superhero

For those of you who don't know who Dr Ted Baehr is, I'll just give you a few simple words: Neo-Nazi, fascist shit-bag. Dr Ted Baehr is on one of those assholes in the world that cry when someone shows their butt on TV or on the big screen. And what has stirred his attention? The film Watchmen because of it's extreme violence, a blue penis, sex and rape - all of which can be found in the Bible, I may add, with the exception of the blue penis (I hope).

Now I made a comment about Dr. Manhattan's blue penis in an earlier post because I was shocked (but mostly amused) to see a family bring their kids into the theater to watch the film. Now I'm not a parent, but I know what bad parenting is - you know, the sort of person who takes their kid to a Rated-R movie would equate a bad parent.

I don't see what's so hard about a person getting online and read a family friendly review site before deciding to take your kid to a film. It's not that hard! Besides, I know better than to ever think a Rated-R movie is appropriate for a kid - we do remember what Rated-R means, right?

But assholes like Dr. Ted Baehr aren't rational people. Rather, they'd like to shove their backward dogma down our throats so he can please his fake god. We all know people like Baehr probably have stockpiles of porn - possibly gay porn, because you know they hate that the most - and they masturbate in public places so kids can see them. You're not a good person, "Dr." Baehr, nor are you an educated man. If you don't like the blue penis, too bad. But you can't say shit about brutal violence (it's in the Bible), sex (it's in the Bible) or rape (it's in the Bible), because they are the foundation of your religion.

With that being said, I wish I had his e-mail so I could send him countless pics of Dr. Manhattan's cock.

That was hot

I'm sitting in my "office" with my buddy watching TV when this Dannon commercial comes on for their Light 'n Fit yogurt. After the lady sucks out the contents of the small container and it falls off her mouth, she smiles. This, apparently, is my friend's cue to say, "Now that was hot. Right? That was really hot."

To be frank, I want to believe that this commercial wasn't suppose to hint blow job, but it does: The lady does suck out the creamy contents of a yogurt container. I'll let you decide for yourselves.

I wonder if this guy's still alive

You sexual deviants have strange fetishes, and I praise you for that. I have a few, none that I'll list here, but I'll will mention they involve rope, duct tape, teeth, women's underwear, panty hose and someone in the corner reading Plato dialogues aloud. But a tornado? That's going to far. Makes me feel sorry for the guy, because no one in the right mind would want to risk life - because leather belts tied to pipes, despite what the movie said, won't be enough to keep a person from being sucked into the vortex - in order to sustain orgasm.

Um...You're like 50, right?

I think I'm going to puke. Not because of the bad Chinese I had for dinner, but because of Madonna. It's like she doesn't know when to stop - I think when you hit 50, you should make an attempt to act your age. Madonna didn't get that memo.

A few years ago, Madonna was only pushing 50 and she was gyrating on the floor. I remember this clearly because I woke up one morning, turned on VH1 and puked. I missed class that day. I called my professor to tell him I had gone blind and was up-chucking the contents of my stomach: "You saw Madonna, didn't you?" was all he managed to say.

Steak & BJ Day

Mark your calendars: March 14th is Steak & BJ Day, the male equivalent to Valentine's Day.

Chris Brown Wants You

So Chris "Slugger" Brown wants his fans - if he has any left - to vote for him for the Kids Choice Awards. Is he serious? He thinks that he deserves an award after what he did? And if we, as a people, don't vote for him, are we all going to be personally beaten by him?

I think we should all send a message to Chris Brown that clearly states that those who abuse women should not be looked upon with celebrity, but with scorn. That no man should be awarded and rewarded for his abusive deeds. So head on to his Myspace post and tell Slugger that he doesn't deserve shit from us little people.

Sexy Ads Don't Cause Rape

"Gee, I wonder why women get raped," the American Apparel sign reads after someone took it into their own hands to graffiti the sign. "Gee, I wonder why women get raped." I have no love for American Apparel, but not for the reasons so many other people have qualms against the clothing company whose exploitation of the phrase Sex Sells has been their foundation for some time now. My disliking of the company is merely political, rather than siding with the hordes of mindless zombies who cry out, "They're objectifying women! This makes me feel bad." Get over it.

Far from the actions of the fore-mothers of feminism, the new breed of feminists have little to complain about. Still, illusions of the glass ceiling are pressed on when a college faculty member accidentally makes a remark on how girls aren't as good as math as boys - something that isn't completely dishonest, just not politically correct (studies have shown a lack of enthusiasm in girls when it comes to math and science - this doesn't mean they're bad at it, just that they're not into it; at the same time, I would like to state here that my girlfriend excels where I fail in algebra, noting that, while some females aren't interested in math, others are really good at it). However, in a nation where women are in control of their bodies - unless the prolifers have their way - and what they do, there can be little to say that objectification exists. It's not like there hasn't been a time when I've turned on the television to see a buff man walking around without a shirt - is this objectifying men? Where are the arguments with that? Why hasn't anybody stood up for us? This is coming from a guy who was never muscular - I went from super thin/scrawny to chubby/overweight (something I'm currently in the works of fixing).

While these ads should make me feel insecure - I'm far from perfect - because half the time I wonder if my girlfriend would rather have a fit, buff guy who can throw her around with ease. However, I manage to swallow the fact that I'm not that sort of guy.

No one fights for the guy who's in his underwear, crossed armed and muscular because nothing ever happens to men - right? So when a woman does something similar, we're automatically labeling it objectifying because woman are capable of getting raped and ads like those that American Apparel releases causes rapists to do what they do? The same is said about pornography, but it's simply not true. Rapists don't get false illusions from pornography - they're already messed up in the first place.

While I may not agree with American Apparel's inconsideration for placing billboards with ads like the one pictured above because children may come across it - and I'm all for protecting the innocence of children - I don't believe that spray painting, "Gee, I wonder why women get raped," across it makes a political statement. Rather it diminishes those women who were, are and will be raped because a man has a power issue, not because he saw a billboard, an ad on his computer, in a magazine or on television.

The Last Word

Love it or hate it, we wake up this morning in a world without The L Word. While a few lesbians out there are mourning the loss of their beloved TV versions, a few of them are probably off celebrating the death of those who do not represent them well enough on TV.

While I find it stupid that those out there were even pissed at the fact that TV lesbians do not compare to real lesbians, I'm the sort of person who boycotts a movie about a small Mexican "dog" because I find it poorly represents my people. I suppose I can understand where you're coming from, angry lesbians.

However, a few of you may have noted that this year hasn't been a stellar year for the lesbian, or homosexuals for that matter. With the evil Prop 8 passing even after we elected the country's first black president, has hindered our ideals of an accepting America. The I'm-just-not-that-into-you mindset has swept across the boob tube when the subject is on the fairer sex who loves the fairer sex: I whole-heartily disagree. Rather than seeing it as the country no longer has any love for the lesbians on television, we should look at it as the country no longer wanting to caricature homosexuals in general because of the series stereotypes that may be pushing Prop 8 supporters to make absurd claims when it comes to same-sex marriage.

Reading Erotica on the 9 o'clock

My mother bought me The Best of Best American Erotica 2008 for my birthday last year. It was something of a milestone for my mother who was born in 1950 and was raised by a very Catholic and traditional family. My grandmother, wasn't the most accepting person in the world, despite how loving she was. Sex was a subject of taboo for her as she raised my mother believing that babies came from swallowing watermelon seeds or when a woman is sitting down wind from a man. Yes, my mother was one of those individuals who happened to find herself, at an early age, facing death the moment her period first came around the corner. Several decades later, on my 25th birthday, my mother takes the book from my hand, looks at it and then at me before saying, "This is what you want?"

Okay, maybe it wasn't the best step forward for my mother, who eventually handed me the money to make the purchase myself, but the fact remains: She bought me the book knowing what she was buying. Later, when I mentioned the event on a blog of mine, Susie Bright commented on the post, stating the 2008 edition was in fact the final edition. So this year, while roaming the aisles at Barnes & Noble, I notice the empty feeling that I will not being seeing another edition. Great.

My mother is probably one of the many people who I've come across of that thinks pornography when they hear the word erotica. One time, on a bus to Brownsville, when I was visiting my at-the-time girlfriend, I pulled out the 2002 Edition and started reading. Because it was a morning bus ride, no one really sat around me to begin with, but the moment the neighbor across the isle saw the sort of "smut" I was reading, his face slackened and suddenly I was a leper. When I got off the bus, the girlfriend saw the book and made a face. Ironically enough, the collection would be the first book she actually wanted to read that wasn't forced on her.

Several years later, I'm sitting at my computer reading a Google Alert that informs me that a website (and I won't link it here because I don't feel the need to) with the term erotica has sold for a nice chunk of money. Curiosity, once again, gets the better of me. Sadly, I am disappointed. I suppose I'm an unusual guy - pornography, while fun to watch, isn't something I wanna see. Disappointed, I find myself wondering if erotica does in fact equal pornography. It's something I'm still attempting to figure out.

Ever get that feeling there's cameras in your room?

I just saw this video and it left me cracking up. Reminds me of an ex-girlfriend I had. Though I don't think she ever actually cheated on me. And if she did, she probably would never own up to it.

On Transgenders & Their Breasts

It's lackluster, really. I'm walking around the store and I see one in the distance. It doesn't take a genius to point them out in the crowd, but it does take a complete idiot (or a whole lot of cosmetic and early hormone procedures) to mistake one for an actual woman. And while I'm not repelled by the transsexual/transvestite, I'm also not attracted to them either - well, most of them anyway.

"Look at that one," my girlfriend-at-the-moment says, pointing out the window. We're in downtown Brownsville, transvestite prostitute territory, as one of them emerges from the shadows in skinny jeans, heels, a blouse that barely covers the paunch of her stomach, badly placed makeup and a receding hairline that is noticeable from space. We cackle at her, not out of prejudice, but at the plain fact that she assumed she looked good coming out of the house like that.

All my significant others (past & present) have on thing in common, however, (and this does fall in to the topic of conversation) and that's the very fact that they feel/felt inadequate when it comes to their chests. Most of them were proportionate with their bodies - can you imagine a thin girl with large breasts (that's some serious back problems we're dealing with) - or a chubby girl with larger breasts than need be (again, the added weight would crush her). And I've done my best to keep the current one (and when I was with the past ones) comforted that their breast size didn't add anything to my affection - large, small or completely flat, I loved them nonetheless and they shouldn't attempt to be define by their cup size.

Then there's the problem: The Tranny with the larger, "perfect" tits. Oy vey.

Explaining a blue penis to your children

I went to see Watchmen yesterday to see if the movie was going to be a big let down. It wasn't. However, don't be like that jerk who went to watch the movie only to complain that it was the worse three hours of his life: It is not a superhero movie in the sense of Spider-man, Batman or Superman are a superhero movie.

Anyway, there I am sitting next to my mother who accompanied me to the film because we do that sometimes when Dr. Manhattan comes out in all his glory. And believe me when I say this, he's naked throughout most of the film and the camera doesn't shy away from his dong. This isn't anything new for me. I've seen worse movies with my mother - Y Tu Mama Tambien comes to mind, as well as a few other movie. However, what made me smirk was the fact the family sitting in front of us contained children ranging from the ages of 9-11 years old (two boys and one girl). How do you even explain that to them? I don't really find it all that offensive if boys see a penis on screen because they have one, but the girl?

Okay, parents, calm down! There's a simple way to avoid all this: DON'T TAKE YOUR CHILDREN TO A RATED R FILM. If you happen to let that slip, then you better be prepared to explain to little Jimmy or Stacey why the man's penis is blue and why it just hangs there. You may also want to prepare yourself for when they ask, "Does the penis get bigger when he gets bigger?" You only have yourself to blame.

Sexing up the youth + Link Love

I'm all up for the return to innocence when it comes to children. For instance, my older brother has reported to my mother than my 14-year-old niece was up for modeling auditions and now is up for acting auditions. Don't get me wrong, I don't mind my niece pursuing her dreams, just as long as her dreams aren't going to overlap her moment to be a kid. She's hardly a child anymore, I know, but 14 is almost the peak - from then on, it's pretty much all downhill for her.

Now I've done essays on modeling sites - not suggesting that this is what my niece will be doing if/when she gets the gig - that focus on underage models. What they basically suggest is fodder for the perverted - the moral loophole! - as none of the children are nude or in the midst of coitus, but their faces and the poses are so provocative that it makes your stomach churn. I remember having nightmares of child erotica after researching for the essay - the topic of course was on the "moral" loophole.

We see child sexualization in our daily life, even if we refuse to. This isn't sexual freedom - not the one I would like to promote - but the moral loophole of child prostitution. No longer are these people selling children for sex, they are turning them into tiny versions of sexualized adults that pout, act provocative, etc. in order to make a buck. With the so-called success of Toddlers and Tiaras, I'm sure we'll be seeing more of these sort of things popping up. What must we do to protect the children?

One person might say censorship, but by censoring the world around us, we are only creating more taboos that will in the future cause more problems. Also, we create a false sense of security that will only mean that sooner or later those walls we build around the youth will crumble and they're hormones will be raging. Rather than any of these things, talking to a child is the best way to get through to them. Most of us cringe at the thought of "the talk," but it must be done. Be in their business - not through a totalitarian way, but in a caring parent (the average teenager, however, will not know the difference).

We'll also have to accept one thing, though. Teens and kids will make mistakes and rather than mulling over them and getting upset - which will only cause a gap in the relationship - always allow them to know that you are always by their side.

And with that in mind, here are your links:

Twitter exposes your child to porn
here

My gf is pissed I touch myself
here

Reasons why you should (not) get a boob job
here

Nude Juice Bar to close
here

Buy the book (pic up top)
here

Horny women, miserable masturbation and sensitive clits
here

Sex & Music
here

I <3 Placoderms!

Scientists have discovered the animal that started it all - sex, that is. I got the link in an e-mail, though I'm a little confused why Fox News is reporting it as we all know Fox News doesn't believe in science, but in imaginary friends in the sky.

I'll be frank, I didn't read the entire article because Fox News bores the crap out of me, but that shouldn't stop you from doing so. I just know that this guy there is the one that may have started the whole process of procreation between two animals rather then asexual activities. Awesome, hu?

Torture porn (NSFW)

Stumbled across this trailer. It's not really safe for work, but because it's YouTube, I'm assuming it's nonnude as well. However, I did glimpse some nipples in there - could be wrong, but I thought I'd warn you anyway.

Here's the website. I'm sure the site itself is completely not safe for work.

So wrong

I almost blew chunks when I saw this picture. No offense, I find pregnant women attractive and all, but a line must be drawn somewhere. I don't think in the least that Octomom Nady Suleman deserves anytime in the lime light because she hasn't done anything to deserve it. "She had eight kids!" My cat had eight kids, big friggin' whoop!

However, I got an e-mail about her being offered one-million dollars from an adult movie company - probably Vivid, or Hustler because they get off on shit like this - as well as a full year's supply of diapers. I'm sorry, but is there anyone in the world who really wants to see this mother of eight get plowed by Ron Jeremy (not saying he will be the guy doing her, but Ron does do a lot of people)?

Exploiting your child is one thing, but creating a sense of fame because you had eight is just beyond grotesque. Please, Octomom, do us all a favor and vanish back to the rock from whence you came.

Sexting

Sexting has been all over the news lately for some freakish reason - well, not really freakish, but child pornography reasons, which I'll address in another blog. Like with sex tapes, sexting can get unwanted results such as your boyfriend dumping you and passing your pictures to all his friends to show off how much of a slut you are, or you girlfriend pissed off because you cheated on you and dedicates a website to your microscopic penis.

I don't mind sexting so much that as long as it is done between two consenting adults who know the consequences of the act. Since the moment we could take pictures, man wanted nothing more to photograph the nude body - even paintings were done and some of them are rather pornographic. However, technology has grown to a point where it can turn a simple perv to an expert peeper - you name it, micro cameras, nanny cams, and the most recently attacked, camera phones, which allow you to take a more discrete photo of a person unwillingly. This, of course, is against the law. And I have no problem with that.

What I do have a problem is charging a consenting adult who agreed to have his/her photo taken and then the jack ass who took it distributing it any which way. Unless you know for sure, and you can't, that that was the model's intention. That's returning to the bedroom, and what goes on in the bedroom between consenting adults so be kept out of the rule books. Period!

Bras & Health

One thing I learned is that a guy should never "notice" another woman not wearing a bra, especially when his girlfriend is around. I'll admit, I broke that rule twice in my life. One not to long ago. A few years back, I was taking a class - go figure - on the beat generation when I noticed a small-breasted girl with her nipples popping out of her tight gray shirt. Normally, I would like not to notice this, especially because here was someone I looked up to - a local writer I once wrote a letter, well e-mail, to - but nonetheless, there were her nipples and my jaw just fell. I made the mistake of telling my girlfriend while she was going on about how she despised women who went around not wearing bras with their stuff just "hanging and swinging freely." I may have made the joke that she didn't seem to mind men who walked around in just boxers without much support, just swinging around down there.

The second incident wasn't too long ago. We were waiting for our order at a local McDonald's when I brought up the wife of a certain college professor whom I thought went around without wearing a bra. The woman's in her fifties, but nevermind that because girlfriend was still mad at me for even noticing. In my defense, I retorted with, "What if a guy with an incredibly large, or incredibly small penis was walking around expose. Can you seriously tell me you wouldn't notice, even if you wish you didn't?"

In all the hoopla of this, the main thing about her and bras is that women are supposed to wear bras in order to keep their shape, prevent them from sagging and a bunch of other things. However, a recent article says otherwise. The bra myths only apply to the growth stage, the article states and that they aren't designed to prevent sagging either. Wow. Does this mean we're going to see more women on the street without one? For my health, I most certainly hope not.

Mike Lohan hacked?

Saw this, thought you'd like to see it as well. Not sure if it's really Mike Lohan's Twitter, or if anything about it being "hacked" is anything remotely important, or true for that matter (the man is a nut job). Either way, I deiced to post this.

Re: Hello Hungry

Just because you're seen with it, doesn't mean you're eating it. Just saying.

A note on the sex tape/photo

I don't know who Edison Chen is, but I know why he's pissed off. Seems like a few photos of his have floated through the Internet - we all know what gets on the Internet stays on the Internet, no matter how much we wish it would just vanish - and now he's hopping mad because of it.

Have we learning from Paris Hilton - or better yet, Kim Kardashian? Like a journal/diary, no one makes a sex tape or a set of photos unless we want someone to watch them. So if you don't want someone watching you do the naughty, or naked, then don't make a record of it. Plain and simple, right?

Two things

A while back, my blog - you know the one I use to write my thoughts and details of my sordid personal life - was found by a troll who decided to disagree with me on a topic that really didn't call out for disagreement (could've been the one about how I saw two cars parked outside my house). Anyway, the troll decided to post some scat pictures to annoy me further, but thankfully WordPress allows me to blacklist people by typing in their e-mail and IP addresses.

It would seem that troll has found away back, or another has found me - either way it's the same M.O. However, because this blog is dedicated to beauty, fashion (I know, right? You're wondering where all that is located on this blog) and, first and foremost, sexual freedom, I don't want to call out a group of fetishists unless they're something way too deviate for me (e.g. pedophiles, if you can call that a fetish). In light of the scat troll, I have come to realized that, while I originally thought furries were disturbed people, I don't understand two things about pornography:

1. What is wrong with the women/men who partake in eating or having fecal matter touch them in these videos, and
   
2. What in the hell is wrong with people who masturbate to scat porn?
   

Current Doldrum

I was wondering, just a second ago actually, about Adrianne Curry. Whatever happened to her? And has her 15 minutes come to an end? If so, when did that happen because I wasn't paying attention.

Katy Perry

Even though I seem to have a love/hate thing going on when it comes to Katy Perry, it's hard to ignore the simple fact: I find her extremely attractive.

A lot of you may not know this, because I never wrote it here, but the reason for my distaste in Katy Perry is her two singles, "I Kissed a Girl" and "UR So Gay." While not homophobic in lyrics, it does bring down the notch for those in the GLBT community, something I happen to be a part of even though I don't go shouting it out on the rooftop of every building - you know, because I'll be arrested. While they lyrics of the latter song aren't suppose to boil anyone's blood, I find it completely offensive to my cause - the new image of man. As for the first song, it is often mistaken for bisexuality but should be noted that it's more about "barsexuality" than anything else.

Nevertheless, Katy Perry - with her Zooey Deschanel physique - is incredibly beautiful, not to mention, talented.

Welcome to Prude Networking Sites

In the last few weeks, both Myspace and Facebook have done a pretty noble thing - removing several thousand users who also happened to be convicted sex offenders. However, coupled with Youtube, both networking sites have now decided to play the prude card with an episode of and a profile page for Midwest Teen Sex Show by removing them due to violation of their TOSs (TOSes?). The episode entitled, "Fetishes," seen above is nothing more than a comedic PSA (if you can call it a PSA) on fetishism and exactly what that entails. The video, as you can see, doesn't violate any of the networking sites' rules, but still managed to be removed.

What humors me, as well as others, is the fact that Myspace, while being so anti-sexual, kept several porn stars actual profiles even though their pictures are as "racy" as the video. In the long run, it's not so much sex that upsets Myspace, but the idea of actually educating its users. Well played, morons.

Hello Hungry!

I'm not alone on this, am I? Lindsay Lohan's new "thinness" is nothing but shocking, right? I've been meaning to write this for some time, but I never came around to doing so. It's disturbing is what it is. I'm not fixated on celebrity, don't get me wrong, but this here is the sort of thing little girls look up and want to be. What sort of example is that?

Someone do her a favor - despite what she said - get this girl a cheeseburger.

[On a side note, this blogger would also like to state that work, stress and sleeplessness have only attributed to his weight gain, not his weight loss.]

Censorship

Apparently Topeka resident, Kim Borchers, thinks books are harmful to minors. We all know titles such as The Joy of Sex, The Lesbian Kama Sutra, Joy of Gay Sex and Sex for Busy People: The Art of the Quickie for Lovers on the Go can cause great harm to a young person's psyche.

However, let me bring up a theory: I believe people like Kim Borchers have such a boring sex life that they have to instill it on everyone else, and then turn around and play the Helen Lovejoy card by saying, "Won't somebody think about the children."

Nothing media-wise is damaging to a minors' psyche, except in the cases where bad parenting plays a card. There are a lot of people who want other entities to raise their children. If Kim Borchers were to simply sit down with her kids and have the inevitable sex talk, then she can be assured that she's making some sort of progress with them. But to censor something? Well, Kim you might as well plaster on a tiny mustache upon your upper lip and ring in the Third Reich.

Link Love

I was thinking of making this blog NSFW, but then remember I always drive those down into the gutter. Plus, I caught wind that NSFW stuff is being deleted by the Blogger gods and I'd rather keep them in good standing.

Anyway, here are you links:

North Dakota to add sexual orientation to human bill of rights
here

Anti-pornography Catholic Propaganda
here

Because he's gay, Rupert Everett can't get work
here

Me Sexy
here

GLBTQ target of crimes
here

The Perfect Lesbian Myth
here

What is said in bed
here

Teen masturbation and condom use supporter
here

Gay is not the new black
here

Lily Allen wants to pose naked
here

Brooklyn Decker Nipple Slip
here

Teen girl faces child porn charges
here

Scarlett's sexy ad
here

From students to sex stars
here

Miley's Pedo boyfriend exposed
here

Butt ugly woman shows a 14-yr-old her tits
here

Couples Massage (PG-13)

Couples Massage - These bloopers are hilarious

Something useful for a change.

Taylor Swift's fear

Taylor Swift doesn't want people picturing her naked - attempting to keep that clean and pristine image of her country stardom. She vows never to become a party girl like Lindsay Lohan or Paris Hilton - this probably means she'll never make a sex tape (which isn't such a bad thing cos I don't find her remotely attractive as it appears someone has smashed in her face with a baseball bat, but that's just one man's opinion).

To be honest, I think Taylor Swift is just the sort of role model the girls of this country need. There's a fine line between being sexually free and just being slutty - Taylor Swift chooses not to discuss sex, not because it's taboo, but because it's her choice. She chooses not to be provocative like the teen celebrities before her, and that is her choice. So kudos Taylor Swift for living your own decisions rather than being influenced by those in control.

However, just because you don't talk about sex doesn't mean that'll keep people from imagining you naked - they're going to do it regardless. Also, I disagree with the definition of rebellion that she puts out. That is not rebellious, that's just mundane.

Because when you think sexy, you think Chyna

Just in case you didn't get enough of Joanie Laurer's (a.k.a. Chyna) tiny cock clit, some spaz over at an adult movie company thought it would be a nifty idea to release more footage of the infamous sex tape between this former wrestling diva and X-Pac. Frankly, celebrity porn bugs me, but there was so much talk about this one I decided to jump on the bandwagon and watch a clip and oh how I wish I hadn't.

Either way, her management said that the tape isn't new and that the couple haven't been sexually involved - or involved on any level - in quite some time. The tape is simply old footage that wasn't released the first time around and that Chyna did not consent to it being put out in the public. However, I say, anyone who makes a sex tape does it so others may see it. Why else would you document it?

Salma Hayek's super mom

You probably already seen this video like a thousand times online already. I still don't get it, though: Why is it so wrong to have sexual relations with a woman who is breast feeding? Some people are just dumb.

Now with less nudity

I just caught wind that Kate Winslet will no longer be taking it off [NSFW] on the big screen. While this may come to as a disappointment to a lot of you, I'm jumping for joy on my side of the world. Granted that Kate may have a killer body, but I think her acting skills are so much better. That's just one man's opinion.

Lesbian Superhero

For those of us still mourning the lost of Bruce Wayne - what the hell was DC thinking, by the way (oh that's right, they weren't) - a "new" light at the end of the tunnel shines and that's Batwoman. According to TV Guide, who is behind the times, apparently, as one nerd commented, has named DC's new idea: Batwoman will be the successor of Batman. So what's so great about that? Because TV Guide, like anything else would, is making a big deal about as if there hasn't been a homosexual superhero before - Watchmen anybody?

I don't care how much of a nerd TV Guide thinks we are, but a lesbian isn't going to make us go around creaming out pants. What will probably get us all hot and bothered will be the erasing of Bruce Wayne's death. Because that shouldn't have happened in the first place. This is Ben Reilly (Spiderman reference) all over again. But only with a lesbian and sans clones.

Link Love

I know I've been a little lazy about posting the last few days, but it's mostly accredited to the fact that I've been job hunting, exercising and attempting something new with my life - feeling great about myself. I have a long road ahead of me.

Anyway, I open my blog today and see something that automatically catches my eye. Kinseyette, over at SEX in the university, posted a caveat for lovers who prefer the woman on top - ahem, such as myself. I'm awfully careful with myself and with my lover, so it's not much of a problem - this isn't the first time I heard about such things, a guy - homosexual guy, I should say - that I knew in high school told me something similar and it used to make me laugh because...well, I won't talk about why it made me laugh. Anyway, here are your links:

SEX in the university
here

Sexy toys for kids
here

Smart teens still want child erotica off the air
here

Katy Perry offends queer community
here

Naked Sax (NSFW)
here

Mardi Gras events
here

Kicked out for being lesbian
here

Lesbians are bisexual
here & here

Massage Bra
here

Cartoon nudity has parents fumed
here

Bikini Girl nude
here

Debunked Sex Myths
here

The Joy Dick

As if gamers needed another reason not to get off their asses and go get laid. The Joydick allows game play to link up with real time masturbation. That means, while these pimply socially inept people are once again given another reason not to go outside and meet real humans. Thanks guys.

On Celibacy (and homosexuality, again)

Mother Teresa isn't the sort of person you want to compare yourself to, unless you're working as a missionary and/or nun - if that were the case, then she'd be your role model. Jill Laing doesn't see it that way though. Jill also compares herself to Isaac Newton as she attempts why celibacy isn't ridiculous. What I find ridiculous is how Miss Laing still believes that homosexuals choose to be gay.

Mother Teresa and Isaac Newton were virgins for good reason, but they're not the sort of people you want to name drop when explaining that you're celibate as well. Mother Teresa was a nun and celibacy comes with that territory; as for Isaac Newton, well he was a mathematician and that's the sort of thing that doesn't get you laid. So, if you dissect the argument correctly, Jill Laing is either a nun or a mathematician, which, seemingly belonging to the Church of Latter Day Saints, I'm assuming she's neither as nuns are mostly not nut jobs and LDS-folk still believe that Native Americans were originally white, so they probably don't have intelligence under their belt anyway.

There's nothing wrong with celibacy, though. If you're a Katy Perry, it's just a ridiculous joke. My main concern about Laing's inability to accept that homosexuality isn't a choice - we're are living in a century where the earth is round, right? You can choose to not have sex, but you can't choose who you will love. It's that simple. And her suggesting that there is "evidence" that proves that homosexuals can go straight is null and void as most of it resides in the church, and we all know that the church always alters things to follow its belief.

I guess what I'm trying to say here is, if you're going to compare yourself to someone, don't go around name dropping historical people who have made a difference. I've read about Mother Teresa and peruse - because I had to - some of Newton's works, and Jill Laing, you are no Mother Teresa or Isaac Newton.